February 04, 2025
Don't Fear the Tariff
Timothy Birdnow
Yes, the threats of tariffs is working.
Canada Concedes to U.S. Tariff Threats, Trudeau Announces Major Border Security Moves [WATCH]
Reader Mike pointed out that much of what happened, at least with Mexico, was a result of events already in motion. Perhaps so but why did they happen only after Trump threatened the big stick? The key to winning such policy disputes is leverage. Trump understands leverage in a big way (he literally wrote the book on it) and while there were negotiations behind the scenes Canada and Mexxico were both far more willing to cut a deal that favored us when facing punitive action.
Had Trump negotiated the way Republicans or Democrats generally do nothing would have happened. He was willing to go to the mat if he had to do so.
"MY STYLE of deal-making is quite simple and straightforward. I aim very high, and then I just keep pushing and pushing and pushing to get what I'm after."
Donald J. Trump
BTW Canada has been as lax as Mexico when it comes to stopping illegal aliens from crossing into the U.S. and that number rose to all time highs in 2024. The only reason we see so many more coming across the southern border is they can start from anywhere in the Americas and hoof it in. There aren't the vast throngs of people waiting in Canada, and the Canadians have to let them in in the first place then tacitly encourage them to migrate into the U.S.
And if we close the southern border the traffic will just move into Canada and come in from there. BOTH borders need to be secured.
This is not the act of a friend. Canada is far better positioned to stop this than is Mexico yet seemed to actually encourage it.
Also,I would add the Reagan Administration slapped a tariff on Canadian lumber (which is still in place today) because Canada was purposely undercutting U.S. lumber prices. The Canadians harvested from public lands and the U.S. limits such production. So it was the Free Trader, Ronald Reagan, who imposed a tariff on Canada in 1982.
more...
Yes, the threats of tariffs is working.
Canada Concedes to U.S. Tariff Threats, Trudeau Announces Major Border Security Moves [WATCH]
Reader Mike pointed out that much of what happened, at least with Mexico, was a result of events already in motion. Perhaps so but why did they happen only after Trump threatened the big stick? The key to winning such policy disputes is leverage. Trump understands leverage in a big way (he literally wrote the book on it) and while there were negotiations behind the scenes Canada and Mexxico were both far more willing to cut a deal that favored us when facing punitive action.
Had Trump negotiated the way Republicans or Democrats generally do nothing would have happened. He was willing to go to the mat if he had to do so.
"MY STYLE of deal-making is quite simple and straightforward. I aim very high, and then I just keep pushing and pushing and pushing to get what I'm after."
Donald J. Trump
BTW Canada has been as lax as Mexico when it comes to stopping illegal aliens from crossing into the U.S. and that number rose to all time highs in 2024. The only reason we see so many more coming across the southern border is they can start from anywhere in the Americas and hoof it in. There aren't the vast throngs of people waiting in Canada, and the Canadians have to let them in in the first place then tacitly encourage them to migrate into the U.S.
And if we close the southern border the traffic will just move into Canada and come in from there. BOTH borders need to be secured.
This is not the act of a friend. Canada is far better positioned to stop this than is Mexico yet seemed to actually encourage it.
Also,I would add the Reagan Administration slapped a tariff on Canadian lumber (which is still in place today) because Canada was purposely undercutting U.S. lumber prices. The Canadians harvested from public lands and the U.S. limits such production. So it was the Free Trader, Ronald Reagan, who imposed a tariff on Canada in 1982.
more...
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:58 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 1251 words, total size 8 kb.
More Arctic Ice Because of Ice Melt
Timothy Birdnow
Tony Heller at Realclimate illustrates the absurdity of the Gang Green. "Meltin Ice" is causing more ice in the Arctic, they claim!
"Melting sea ice is hindering, not helping, Canadian Arctic shipping
Thick sea ice is flowing into the Northwest Passage, complicating predictions that melting ice due to climate change will open a shorter route between oceans”
Melting sea ice is hindering, not helping, Canadian Arctic shipping | New Scientist
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:44 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 79 words, total size 1 kb.
Trump Procrastinating on Judicial Appointments
Timothy Birdnow
Trump's election is causing a flurry of retirements from the bench and yet Mr. Trump has failed to nominate a single candidate for their replacements as of yet, according to this article at the Reform Club.
According to Seth Tillman:
"At the start of Trump-47, on January 20, 2025, there were 45 federal judicial vacancies—all were Article III vacancies.
There are now 50 federal judicial vacancies, including, 49 Article III positions, one Article I position: USDC for the DISTRICT of the VIRGIN ISLANDS.
There are 874 authorized Article III federal judicial positions, with 50 Article III vacancies, amounting to a 6% vacancy rate.
Most recent vacancies:
GREGORY K. FRIZZELL, USDC for the DISTRICT of NORTHERN OKLAHOMA, taking senior status; and,
RONALD A. WHITE, USDC for the DISTRICT of EASTERN OKLAHOMA took senior status.
To date, Trump-47 has sent ZERO nominations to fill vacant federal judicial positions to the U.S. Senate."
fin
I get it; Trump has a lot on his plate and figures he needs to get the political appointees out of the way quickly. But these judgeships are too important to give the Democrats and the media time to stop - and they have a much longer impact on our country than does the political appointees.
I should hope Trump has candidates already picked and can get them rolling soon. Time is of the essence with all of this. Right now the Democrats are shell-shocked and they need to remain so before they can organize.
This is classic military tactics. The Germans called it Blitzkreig, but in fact it's as old as warfare. Genghis Khan used to move in lightning quick, for instance. So did many other ancient generals who were successful. During the Civil War Quantril attacked suddenly and ferociously, and his tactics are taught in military schools to this day. (Yes, his tactics were sound even if he was a monster.)
Sun Tzu said: "Whoever is first in the field and awaits the coming of the enemy, will be fresh for the fight; whoever is second in the field and has to hasten to battle will arrive exhausted . 2. Therefore the clever combatant imposes his will on the enemy, but does not allow the enemy's will to be imposed on him."
A military leader must move boldly, swiftly, and decisively. The enemy must be made to give chase. This is what the Republicans never seem to learn, that the race is to the swift. They have been in permanent defensive mode for so long they have no idea how to go on offense. All they ever do is take pot-shots from their lagger and hope not to be picked off themselves. Trump is attacking and that requires a whole different strategy.
Politics is war by other means and the same strategies apply.
Niccolo Macchiavelli stated:
"He has undertaken his actions in such a way and so quickly that men have have the opportunity to conspire against him.”
And while Macchiavelli isn't exactly a role model for moral behavior he was correct in many of his principles - especially this one.
The time is ripe to ram these judicial nominations down the Left's throats; let them chew them and they will spit them out.
Trump's election is causing a flurry of retirements from the bench and yet Mr. Trump has failed to nominate a single candidate for their replacements as of yet, according to this article at the Reform Club.
According to Seth Tillman:
"At the start of Trump-47, on January 20, 2025, there were 45 federal judicial vacancies—all were Article III vacancies.
There are now 50 federal judicial vacancies, including, 49 Article III positions, one Article I position: USDC for the DISTRICT of the VIRGIN ISLANDS.
There are 874 authorized Article III federal judicial positions, with 50 Article III vacancies, amounting to a 6% vacancy rate.
Most recent vacancies:
GREGORY K. FRIZZELL, USDC for the DISTRICT of NORTHERN OKLAHOMA, taking senior status; and,
RONALD A. WHITE, USDC for the DISTRICT of EASTERN OKLAHOMA took senior status.
To date, Trump-47 has sent ZERO nominations to fill vacant federal judicial positions to the U.S. Senate."
fin
I get it; Trump has a lot on his plate and figures he needs to get the political appointees out of the way quickly. But these judgeships are too important to give the Democrats and the media time to stop - and they have a much longer impact on our country than does the political appointees.
I should hope Trump has candidates already picked and can get them rolling soon. Time is of the essence with all of this. Right now the Democrats are shell-shocked and they need to remain so before they can organize.
This is classic military tactics. The Germans called it Blitzkreig, but in fact it's as old as warfare. Genghis Khan used to move in lightning quick, for instance. So did many other ancient generals who were successful. During the Civil War Quantril attacked suddenly and ferociously, and his tactics are taught in military schools to this day. (Yes, his tactics were sound even if he was a monster.)
Sun Tzu said: "Whoever is first in the field and awaits the coming of the enemy, will be fresh for the fight; whoever is second in the field and has to hasten to battle will arrive exhausted . 2. Therefore the clever combatant imposes his will on the enemy, but does not allow the enemy's will to be imposed on him."
A military leader must move boldly, swiftly, and decisively. The enemy must be made to give chase. This is what the Republicans never seem to learn, that the race is to the swift. They have been in permanent defensive mode for so long they have no idea how to go on offense. All they ever do is take pot-shots from their lagger and hope not to be picked off themselves. Trump is attacking and that requires a whole different strategy.
Politics is war by other means and the same strategies apply.
Niccolo Macchiavelli stated:
"He has undertaken his actions in such a way and so quickly that men have have the opportunity to conspire against him.”
And while Macchiavelli isn't exactly a role model for moral behavior he was correct in many of his principles - especially this one.
The time is ripe to ram these judicial nominations down the Left's throats; let them chew them and they will spit them out.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:38 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 544 words, total size 4 kb.
February 03, 2025
FBI Faked Evidence
Timothy Birdnow
Alan Dershowitz writes about a major scandal where the FBI created fake evidence to convict people.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2025/jan/29/fbi-photo-tampering-scandal-raises-alarming-questi/
Here is the op-ed by Dershowitz:
What happens when the government doesn’t just bend the rules but breaks them entirely?
This question lies at the heart of a high-profile prosecution that began as a #MeToo case involving adult accusers but took a dramatic and troubling turn. Just nine weeks before trial — and 11 months after the seizure of evidence — a Canon camera and an external hard drive were suddenly "accidentally discovered” to contain evidence of alleged child pornography. This late "discovery” not only added new charges but also pressured several co-defendants into pleading guilty.
However, according to experts, the evidence wasn’t discovered; it was invented. Seven experts, including four former FBI forensic examiners, concluded in a joint report submitted to the court: "Photos were planted and staged … with timestamps and folder names manipulated, apparently to simulate a 2005 timeframe. This conclusion is critical because the government depended entirely on these photos’ timestamps and folder names being authentic to argue that 22 of the photos were … illegal, based on the subject’s age being fifteen in 2005. This tampering … involved the manipulation of hundreds of files and time stamps.”
What makes this case even more alarming is how the judge and prosecution have shielded the alleged misconduct from proper scrutiny. Requests to access withheld evidence have been denied, and the defense has been prevented from obtaining records essential to understanding the full scope of the misconduct. It has also been denied an evidentiary hearing at which the evidence can be tested by cross-examination. If the justice system cannot hold the government accountable in such a case with such extensive proof of malfeasance, what hope is there for fairness in cases where the misconduct is less obvious?
Even those who served within the FBI are raising alarms. Dr. James Richard Kiper, a retired FBI agent whose work contributed to the FBI Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2016, personally reached out to FBI Director Christopher Wray about the misconduct in this case. In his email, he warned:
"After my 20 years of faithful service to the FBI … I was extremely disappointed — actually, outraged — at how the FBI handled the digital evidence in this case. You should feel the same way. The difference is that you can do something about it before it becomes the biggest FBI evidence scandal since the FBI Laboratory trace evidence fiasco in the 1990s.”
This is not a partisan case. The defendant, Keith Raniere, is not a political figure, yet the systemic failures in his case echo many of the concerns raised in today’s national debate over FBI and Justice Department reform. This case offers a stark reminder that unchecked power and unaccountable institutions pose a threat to every American.
As a nation, we must separate personal opinions about individual defendants from the principles of justice. If the government can fabricate evidence against someone like Raniere, who will hold it accountable when it turns that power against the rest of us?
Advertisement
What we seek at this time is an evidentiary hearing at which we can present our evidence, subject to cross-examination, so the judge and the public can determine, based on facts, whether our serious allegations are true. There is no reason for the government to oppose such an inquiry, yet they did so from the beginning of the case and continue to do so now.
The time has come, indeed it is long past, for the government to end the cover-up of what experienced experts regard as a major scandal.
If they did nothing wrong, they should have nothing to hide. If they are refusing to let the truth come out, the public has the right to conclude that they do apparently have something to hide. The public has the right to know what they are afraid will come out at a hearing.
Sunlight is a good disinfectant, and blocking the sun will make the infection — if there is one, as the experts have concluded — fester. So, it’s in the interest of all Americans for there to be a hearing on this important issue.
• Alan Dershowitz is a consultant to the attorneys of Keith Raniere on constitutional issues.
Alan Dershowitz writes about a major scandal where the FBI created fake evidence to convict people.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2025/jan/29/fbi-photo-tampering-scandal-raises-alarming-questi/
Here is the op-ed by Dershowitz:
What happens when the government doesn’t just bend the rules but breaks them entirely?
This question lies at the heart of a high-profile prosecution that began as a #MeToo case involving adult accusers but took a dramatic and troubling turn. Just nine weeks before trial — and 11 months after the seizure of evidence — a Canon camera and an external hard drive were suddenly "accidentally discovered” to contain evidence of alleged child pornography. This late "discovery” not only added new charges but also pressured several co-defendants into pleading guilty.
However, according to experts, the evidence wasn’t discovered; it was invented. Seven experts, including four former FBI forensic examiners, concluded in a joint report submitted to the court: "Photos were planted and staged … with timestamps and folder names manipulated, apparently to simulate a 2005 timeframe. This conclusion is critical because the government depended entirely on these photos’ timestamps and folder names being authentic to argue that 22 of the photos were … illegal, based on the subject’s age being fifteen in 2005. This tampering … involved the manipulation of hundreds of files and time stamps.”
What makes this case even more alarming is how the judge and prosecution have shielded the alleged misconduct from proper scrutiny. Requests to access withheld evidence have been denied, and the defense has been prevented from obtaining records essential to understanding the full scope of the misconduct. It has also been denied an evidentiary hearing at which the evidence can be tested by cross-examination. If the justice system cannot hold the government accountable in such a case with such extensive proof of malfeasance, what hope is there for fairness in cases where the misconduct is less obvious?
Even those who served within the FBI are raising alarms. Dr. James Richard Kiper, a retired FBI agent whose work contributed to the FBI Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2016, personally reached out to FBI Director Christopher Wray about the misconduct in this case. In his email, he warned:
"After my 20 years of faithful service to the FBI … I was extremely disappointed — actually, outraged — at how the FBI handled the digital evidence in this case. You should feel the same way. The difference is that you can do something about it before it becomes the biggest FBI evidence scandal since the FBI Laboratory trace evidence fiasco in the 1990s.”
This is not a partisan case. The defendant, Keith Raniere, is not a political figure, yet the systemic failures in his case echo many of the concerns raised in today’s national debate over FBI and Justice Department reform. This case offers a stark reminder that unchecked power and unaccountable institutions pose a threat to every American.
As a nation, we must separate personal opinions about individual defendants from the principles of justice. If the government can fabricate evidence against someone like Raniere, who will hold it accountable when it turns that power against the rest of us?
Advertisement
What we seek at this time is an evidentiary hearing at which we can present our evidence, subject to cross-examination, so the judge and the public can determine, based on facts, whether our serious allegations are true. There is no reason for the government to oppose such an inquiry, yet they did so from the beginning of the case and continue to do so now.
The time has come, indeed it is long past, for the government to end the cover-up of what experienced experts regard as a major scandal.
If they did nothing wrong, they should have nothing to hide. If they are refusing to let the truth come out, the public has the right to conclude that they do apparently have something to hide. The public has the right to know what they are afraid will come out at a hearing.
Sunlight is a good disinfectant, and blocking the sun will make the infection — if there is one, as the experts have concluded — fester. So, it’s in the interest of all Americans for there to be a hearing on this important issue.
• Alan Dershowitz is a consultant to the attorneys of Keith Raniere on constitutional issues.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
12:18 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 720 words, total size 5 kb.
Panama Hat Trick
Timothy Birdnow
Meanwhile down in Panama el presidente' Jose' Raul Mulina is meeting with Mrco Rubio after insisting there would be no talks over the Canal issue. Oh, and he also agreed to leave China's Belt and Road Project and reduce Chinese influence over his country.
He's going to be dragged kicking and screaming, butt dragged he will be. I don't know if Trump is prepared to go to the mat or if he'll be satisfied with a deal. Panama won't give up the canal willingly I am sure, but how can they stop Trump? In the end a deal, any deal, is better than losing the canal.
Meanwhile down in Panama el presidente' Jose' Raul Mulina is meeting with Mrco Rubio after insisting there would be no talks over the Canal issue. Oh, and he also agreed to leave China's Belt and Road Project and reduce Chinese influence over his country.
He's going to be dragged kicking and screaming, butt dragged he will be. I don't know if Trump is prepared to go to the mat or if he'll be satisfied with a deal. Panama won't give up the canal willingly I am sure, but how can they stop Trump? In the end a deal, any deal, is better than losing the canal.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
11:25 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 111 words, total size 1 kb.
FBI Director Refuses Direct Order from Trump
Timothy Birdnow
So the refusniks are going to committ sedition, are they?
Driscoll refuses order to list FBI employees involved in Jan. 6 cases amid ouster of agency leaders
Brian Driscoll is a lifer at the FBI and was tapped by Trump to be temporary director until Kash Patel is confirmed. This shows just how deep the corruption goes in the FBI and why it shouold be Patel's job (assuming he's confirmed) to shut it down, not fix it. I don't think it CAN be fixed.
This also shows why the Senate needed to move more quickly on these appointments; Driscoll is no doubt busy shredding documents that incriminate the Bureau.
Trump should immediately fire him from Acting Director and put someone else in. I'm sure he had others he was considering for the job.
The FBI is under the Department of Justice and Driscoll serves at Trump's pleasure. Time to make sure they all know who is in charge.
So the refusniks are going to committ sedition, are they?
Driscoll refuses order to list FBI employees involved in Jan. 6 cases amid ouster of agency leaders
Brian Driscoll is a lifer at the FBI and was tapped by Trump to be temporary director until Kash Patel is confirmed. This shows just how deep the corruption goes in the FBI and why it shouold be Patel's job (assuming he's confirmed) to shut it down, not fix it. I don't think it CAN be fixed.
This also shows why the Senate needed to move more quickly on these appointments; Driscoll is no doubt busy shredding documents that incriminate the Bureau.
Trump should immediately fire him from Acting Director and put someone else in. I'm sure he had others he was considering for the job.
The FBI is under the Department of Justice and Driscoll serves at Trump's pleasure. Time to make sure they all know who is in charge.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
11:06 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 167 words, total size 1 kb.
Mexico Caves
Timothy Birdnow
More winning! Mexico has folded like an accordian and Trump postponed the tariffs on the them in exchange for their agreeing to send 10,00 troops to the border to aid in securing it.
I called it. Mexico cannot afford the huge hit they were going to take over this.
Canada will be tougher as Trudeau is throwing a hail mary pass; he needs something major to stay in power. And Canadians resent being treated like America's little brother; at a recent NHL game in Canada fans broke out in spontaneous booing of the Star Spangled Banner. (We owe them a return favor for that.) Anti-Americanism is popular among the donut eaters and this will work politically in Trudeau's favor - until the crunch comes and Canadians start feeling the pinch.
I believe we can make do without the things Canada sends us. I mean, how much maple syrup do we really need? We get oil from them but have our own and now we can go get it! They need our electronics, our cars and trucks and aircraft, our medical services. That last is a biggie; Canadians use the U.S. healthcare system when they are seriously ill beccause the Canadian health service is fine if you aren't sick but you usually expire well before being properly treated - if they will treat you at all. Dying Canadians aren't going to like Trudeau making it harder for them to seek medical care.
Oh, and we have our own beer, thank you very much. Who needs Molson or Labatts when you can buy a Sam Adams or Sierra Nevada or Schlafley's?
So put that in your backbacon smoker Canukleheads!
More winning! Mexico has folded like an accordian and Trump postponed the tariffs on the them in exchange for their agreeing to send 10,00 troops to the border to aid in securing it.
I called it. Mexico cannot afford the huge hit they were going to take over this.
Canada will be tougher as Trudeau is throwing a hail mary pass; he needs something major to stay in power. And Canadians resent being treated like America's little brother; at a recent NHL game in Canada fans broke out in spontaneous booing of the Star Spangled Banner. (We owe them a return favor for that.) Anti-Americanism is popular among the donut eaters and this will work politically in Trudeau's favor - until the crunch comes and Canadians start feeling the pinch.
I believe we can make do without the things Canada sends us. I mean, how much maple syrup do we really need? We get oil from them but have our own and now we can go get it! They need our electronics, our cars and trucks and aircraft, our medical services. That last is a biggie; Canadians use the U.S. healthcare system when they are seriously ill beccause the Canadian health service is fine if you aren't sick but you usually expire well before being properly treated - if they will treat you at all. Dying Canadians aren't going to like Trudeau making it harder for them to seek medical care.
Oh, and we have our own beer, thank you very much. Who needs Molson or Labatts when you can buy a Sam Adams or Sierra Nevada or Schlafley's?
So put that in your backbacon smoker Canukleheads!
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:54 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 281 words, total size 2 kb.
CBS Looking to SettleOver Harris Interview
Timothy Birdnow
This isn't enough; charges of election tampering need to be filed after they buck up.
Paramount Looks To Settle Trump’s $10 Billion Lawsuit Over Edited Kamala Harris "60 Minutes” Interview
Paramount's primary shareholder wants to settle the suit since she's trying to sell the company.
But folks in the news division at CBS aren't happy:
Uh, you guys have been a laughingstock for a long time now. This won't change a thing.
CBS deceptively edited Kamala Harris' interview to make her seem more erudite than the raw footage showed. She pretty much was a mess as usual but they tampered with it to make her look good just prior to the election.
This isn't enough; charges of election tampering need to be filed after they buck up.
Paramount Looks To Settle Trump’s $10 Billion Lawsuit Over Edited Kamala Harris "60 Minutes” Interview
Paramount's primary shareholder wants to settle the suit since she's trying to sell the company.
But folks in the news division at CBS aren't happy:
'"Trump’s lawsuit was a joke, but if we settle, we become the laughingstock,” an unnamed CBS correspondent told CNN’s Brian Stelter."
Uh, you guys have been a laughingstock for a long time now. This won't change a thing.
CBS deceptively edited Kamala Harris' interview to make her seem more erudite than the raw footage showed. She pretty much was a mess as usual but they tampered with it to make her look good just prior to the election.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:29 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 141 words, total size 1 kb.
Defunding South Africa
Timothy Birdnow
South Africa is seizing land from white people without compensation and Trump is going to cut off aid until they start behaving better.
In a Truth Social post Trump said:
The Bantu Peoples (black South Africans not of Zulu descent) have no historic claim on this land; the land was empty when Afrikaaners showed up and built settlements. The Bantu mostly came for jobs. Prior to that it was rough country not really worth settling and they had to worry about the Zulus getting them. If anybody has a historical claim to the land it would be the Zulus. But it was the Boers who built the civilization there, and those farms were built by their sweat and blood. Ownership is a Divinely ordained right and, as John Locke eloqueted, ownership of land comes from improving the land. Until the Boers came the land was in a state of nature.
So black South Africans have no legal claim on the land; the majority black South African government is merely seizing it because they want it.
Funny how the whole world turned on South Africa during the Apartheid era, yet yawns at the atrocities being committed by the government there now that it is in black hands and white people are the ones being abused.
Where are the boycotts, the protest marches, the defunding? Only Trump is willing to go there.
According to the article:
This was predictable; the African National Congres (ANC), the party that has pretty much rules South Africa since the white minority turned over power, was always full of Communists and this is the same thing that happened in neighboring Rhodesia, which was then supposed to be Zimbabwe Rhodesia, but is now just Zimbabwe; there are almost no whites left there, and they had to leave with just the clothes on their backs. The man who took power after Rhodesia ceded it was a closet Communist who came out of the closet after attaining power, and he drove the country into the ground. It's now one of the poorest hellholes in the world.
South Africa fared better but has been in decline for a generation now and is increasingly poor and chaoitic.
They used to have nuclear weapons; our government monitored their testing in the South Atlantic. I doubt they can so much as field fighter jets now, even if they bought them from somewhere else.
We should have long ago cut off foreign aid to South Africa and other nations. It's past time.
South Africa is seizing land from white people without compensation and Trump is going to cut off aid until they start behaving better.
In a Truth Social post Trump said:
"treating certain classes of people very badly.”
"It is a bad situation that the Radical Left Media doesn’t want to so much as mention,” the president stated. "A massive Human Rights violation, at a minimum, is happening for all to see. The United States won’t stand for it, we will act.”
"It is a bad situation that the Radical Left Media doesn’t want to so much as mention,” the president stated. "A massive Human Rights violation, at a minimum, is happening for all to see. The United States won’t stand for it, we will act.”
The Bantu Peoples (black South Africans not of Zulu descent) have no historic claim on this land; the land was empty when Afrikaaners showed up and built settlements. The Bantu mostly came for jobs. Prior to that it was rough country not really worth settling and they had to worry about the Zulus getting them. If anybody has a historical claim to the land it would be the Zulus. But it was the Boers who built the civilization there, and those farms were built by their sweat and blood. Ownership is a Divinely ordained right and, as John Locke eloqueted, ownership of land comes from improving the land. Until the Boers came the land was in a state of nature.
So black South Africans have no legal claim on the land; the majority black South African government is merely seizing it because they want it.
Funny how the whole world turned on South Africa during the Apartheid era, yet yawns at the atrocities being committed by the government there now that it is in black hands and white people are the ones being abused.
Where are the boycotts, the protest marches, the defunding? Only Trump is willing to go there.
According to the article:
"Ramaphosa’s office stated that reasons for expropriating land can include promoting inclusivity and allowing access to natural resources. The bill would repeal the nation’s Expropriation Act of 1975, which required the state to compensate owners for the land it sought to seize.
This was predictable; the African National Congres (ANC), the party that has pretty much rules South Africa since the white minority turned over power, was always full of Communists and this is the same thing that happened in neighboring Rhodesia, which was then supposed to be Zimbabwe Rhodesia, but is now just Zimbabwe; there are almost no whites left there, and they had to leave with just the clothes on their backs. The man who took power after Rhodesia ceded it was a closet Communist who came out of the closet after attaining power, and he drove the country into the ground. It's now one of the poorest hellholes in the world.
South Africa fared better but has been in decline for a generation now and is increasingly poor and chaoitic.
They used to have nuclear weapons; our government monitored their testing in the South Atlantic. I doubt they can so much as field fighter jets now, even if they bought them from somewhere else.
We should have long ago cut off foreign aid to South Africa and other nations. It's past time.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:09 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 515 words, total size 3 kb.
USAID on the Chopping Block
Timothy Birdnow
Trump wants to
The CIA has ties to USAID and was caught operating at least one program - the "Cuban Twitter" program. That was a CIA operation to create a Twitter for Cuba to foment a color revolution.
Elon Musk, owner of what used to be Twitter, no doubt has information on this. Musk is encouraging Trump to kill USAID.
It would be wise to defang this rogue agency. The CIA has shown it's no friend of the Trump Administration or MAGA and the way the election of 2020 turned out smells to high heaven of a CIA color revolution. It had every element of one - the smearing, the false flag operations, the gaslighting were all present.
The CIA organized the Orange Revolution in Ukraine that ousted their pro-Russian President and installed a puppet government there. They have a lot of experience doing that.
And I fully believe the assassination attempt on Trump was planned by the CIA. They probably didn't want their hand in it too directly so got that kid to do it - recruited him and facilitated it. You do notice we have heard nary a word about it since it happened. When information just dries up like that you can bet someone in a high place has so decreed it to disappear.
Frankly, I wish Trump would disband the agency completely, as well as the NSA and FBI. These are groups that believe this is their country and we just live in it at their pleasure.
Trump wants to
The CIA has ties to USAID and was caught operating at least one program - the "Cuban Twitter" program. That was a CIA operation to create a Twitter for Cuba to foment a color revolution.
Elon Musk, owner of what used to be Twitter, no doubt has information on this. Musk is encouraging Trump to kill USAID.
It would be wise to defang this rogue agency. The CIA has shown it's no friend of the Trump Administration or MAGA and the way the election of 2020 turned out smells to high heaven of a CIA color revolution. It had every element of one - the smearing, the false flag operations, the gaslighting were all present.
The CIA organized the Orange Revolution in Ukraine that ousted their pro-Russian President and installed a puppet government there. They have a lot of experience doing that.
And I fully believe the assassination attempt on Trump was planned by the CIA. They probably didn't want their hand in it too directly so got that kid to do it - recruited him and facilitated it. You do notice we have heard nary a word about it since it happened. When information just dries up like that you can bet someone in a high place has so decreed it to disappear.
Frankly, I wish Trump would disband the agency completely, as well as the NSA and FBI. These are groups that believe this is their country and we just live in it at their pleasure.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:42 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 258 words, total size 2 kb.
Border Jumping WAY Down
Timothy Birdnow
Border crossings are down 93% according to DHS Secretary Tom Homan.
Tired of winning yet?
Border crossings are down 93% according to DHS Secretary Tom Homan.
Tired of winning yet?
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:19 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 21 words, total size 1 kb.
February 02, 2025
The Second Mexican War?
Timothy Birdnow
We may have a second Mexican war soon.
Mexican cartels are threatening to kill ICE agents and suggest they may use drones to attack them. If the Mexican government refuses to act I suspect America will do what she id when Poncho Villa was raiding our territory - send in John Pershing and George Patton. (Well, not Pershing and Patton themselves but their modern equivalent.) The same was largely true in the runup to the first Mexican war when Mexicans were raiding settlements in Texas and then started massing troops at the border. If Mexico won't stop this Mr. Trump certainly will.
Most people are unaware but when Texas rebelled against Mexico the New Mexico territory - and area south of the border, rebelled as well. For a short time they created the Republic of the Rio Grande which was crushed by Santa Ana on his way to fight the Texans. Rio Grande was much easier to reach and take than Texas, which was a far-flung province with poor transportation and communications, making it very difficult for Santa Ana's traditional stand-up army to take. Sam Houston was able to lure Santa Ana deep into the hinterland where he was vulnerable. That wouldn't have worked in the flats in Rio Grande. Houston attacked in a swamp.
At any rate perhaps we should revisit the idea of a Republic of the Rio Grande, an American protectorate?
I don't know but Mexico can't and won't deal with the Cartels, and those Cartels are going after us now. We need to show our power.
it would be a bad thing to have to invade Mexico itself but we may have little choice. Sadly we won't fight it as we did the first war; Gen. Winfield Scott ordered the immediate hanging of any Mexican caught fighting without a uniform. That put an end to guerilla warfare. Today we'll be too "civilized" for that and probably would face an "insurgency" that would take years to quell if we quell it at all.
So optimally we don't want to fight this, but a quick incursion would be acceptable. Something will have to be done.
We may have a second Mexican war soon.
Mexican cartels are threatening to kill ICE agents and suggest they may use drones to attack them. If the Mexican government refuses to act I suspect America will do what she id when Poncho Villa was raiding our territory - send in John Pershing and George Patton. (Well, not Pershing and Patton themselves but their modern equivalent.) The same was largely true in the runup to the first Mexican war when Mexicans were raiding settlements in Texas and then started massing troops at the border. If Mexico won't stop this Mr. Trump certainly will.
Most people are unaware but when Texas rebelled against Mexico the New Mexico territory - and area south of the border, rebelled as well. For a short time they created the Republic of the Rio Grande which was crushed by Santa Ana on his way to fight the Texans. Rio Grande was much easier to reach and take than Texas, which was a far-flung province with poor transportation and communications, making it very difficult for Santa Ana's traditional stand-up army to take. Sam Houston was able to lure Santa Ana deep into the hinterland where he was vulnerable. That wouldn't have worked in the flats in Rio Grande. Houston attacked in a swamp.
At any rate perhaps we should revisit the idea of a Republic of the Rio Grande, an American protectorate?
I don't know but Mexico can't and won't deal with the Cartels, and those Cartels are going after us now. We need to show our power.
it would be a bad thing to have to invade Mexico itself but we may have little choice. Sadly we won't fight it as we did the first war; Gen. Winfield Scott ordered the immediate hanging of any Mexican caught fighting without a uniform. That put an end to guerilla warfare. Today we'll be too "civilized" for that and probably would face an "insurgency" that would take years to quell if we quell it at all.
So optimally we don't want to fight this, but a quick incursion would be acceptable. Something will have to be done.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
12:21 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 363 words, total size 2 kb.
Warning System Down
Timothy Birdnow
Well...
FAA national warning system for pilots is down, outage last night.
Does anybody else find all this a bit suspicious? Maybe I'm paranoid but all of these problems coming at once, just after Trump takes office and seeks to downsize government strikes me as odd. We know how ruthless the Left and the Deep State can be.
Well...
FAA national warning system for pilots is down, outage last night.
Does anybody else find all this a bit suspicious? Maybe I'm paranoid but all of these problems coming at once, just after Trump takes office and seeks to downsize government strikes me as odd. We know how ruthless the Left and the Deep State can be.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
12:03 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 63 words, total size 1 kb.
Girl's Night Out
Timothy Birdnow
The co-pilot of the Blackhawk helicopter that hit a passenger plane was also a woman.
https://www.the-sun.com/news/13434244/soldier-plane-dc-crash-rebecca-lobach/
As I have pointed out in a prior post, there are indeed women who would make good pilots BUT there was such a big push to get them in they took in less qualified candidates and saw to it they succeed. Women pilots in the Navy, for instance, are given extra downs (demerits) before they wash out of the program, or used to anyway.
One wonders if these gals were really capable of the task they were given.
The co-pilot of the Blackhawk helicopter that hit a passenger plane was also a woman.
https://www.the-sun.com/news/13434244/soldier-plane-dc-crash-rebecca-lobach/
As I have pointed out in a prior post, there are indeed women who would make good pilots BUT there was such a big push to get them in they took in less qualified candidates and saw to it they succeed. Women pilots in the Navy, for instance, are given extra downs (demerits) before they wash out of the program, or used to anyway.
One wonders if these gals were really capable of the task they were given.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
11:59 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 99 words, total size 1 kb.
Schumer Under Investigation
Timothy Birdnow
The DOJ is launching an investigation into minority leader Chuck Schumer over his threats against two Supreme Court Justices a few years ago.
Schumer made a veiled threat against Brett kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch, addressing them at a rally:
"I want to tell you Justice Kvanaugh and Justice Gorsuch, you have unleashed a whirlwind and you wil pay the price"
This is a violation of 18 U.S. Code S 115.You cannot threaten a judge or legislator to change the outcome of a vote or ruling.
Perhaps justice will finally be served? The Democrats have imposed laws on us they exempt themselves from for years now.
The DOJ is launching an investigation into minority leader Chuck Schumer over his threats against two Supreme Court Justices a few years ago.
Schumer made a veiled threat against Brett kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch, addressing them at a rally:
"I want to tell you Justice Kvanaugh and Justice Gorsuch, you have unleashed a whirlwind and you wil pay the price"
This is a violation of 18 U.S. Code S 115.You cannot threaten a judge or legislator to change the outcome of a vote or ruling.
Perhaps justice will finally be served? The Democrats have imposed laws on us they exempt themselves from for years now.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
11:21 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 110 words, total size 1 kb.
Cheerio CEO's!
Timothy Birdnow
These were the clowns who gave us DEI, no doubt.
Record Number of American CEOs Quit: Report
These were the clowns who gave us DEI, no doubt.
Record Number of American CEOs Quit: Report
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
11:16 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 21 words, total size 1 kb.
Winning
Timothy Birdnow
Don't tell me tariffs aren't going to work!
China Will Accept the Return of it's Migrants from U.S.
Why would they if it weren't for the big stick of Mr. Trump?
Don't tell me tariffs aren't going to work!
China Will Accept the Return of it's Migrants from U.S.
Why would they if it weren't for the big stick of Mr. Trump?
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
11:14 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 34 words, total size 1 kb.
Another Hogg at the trough
Timothy Birdnow
David Hogg, the insufferable little snot who made his claim to fame trashing gun rights after the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting, is now a Democratic Co-Chair. That's fitting; a know-nothing knothead is one of the people running the children's party.
Just one more hogg at the Democratic trough.
David Hogg, the insufferable little snot who made his claim to fame trashing gun rights after the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting, is now a Democratic Co-Chair. That's fitting; a know-nothing knothead is one of the people running the children's party.
Just one more hogg at the Democratic trough.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
11:05 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 57 words, total size 1 kb.
Gotcha Question; Was Snowden a Traitor
Timothy Birdnow
During Tulsi Gabbard's confirmation hearing she was badgered by several Democrats about whether she considered Edward Snowden a traitor. Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla., and Sen. Michael Bennet both badgered her for an answer to that question, a point that is entirely moot, yet it was the best they could do. Gabbard's response was to try to move away from the issue. Gabbard admitted he broke the law but wouldn't use the term traitor, which was purposely chosen by the Democrats to drive a wedge between her and the MAGA wing of the Republican Party, many of whom consider him either a hero or at least a whistleblower.
Were I she I would have demanded a definition of traitor by the good Senators, and asked who decided if someone was met that definition or not. I would have pointed out that Mr. Snowden isn't a traitor until found guilty of treason by a court of law, and I supported the rule of law unlike these gentlemen who apparently place themselves above
I would point out that by their own standards certainly Hunter Biden was a traitor, and probably his old man and ask if they would call him such publicly right now.
Of course it's easy to say such things from the comfort of my armchair; not so easy in front of the whole world with people who hold your fate in their hands screaming at you.
I would mention John Kerry violating the Logan Act. I would mention the Biden Administration giving intel to Hamas. I would mention Ted Kennedy talking to Moscow. I would mention Gen. Milley telling the Chicoms he would alert them if Trump made a move against them. I would mention Bill Clinton giving Loral Aerospace a waiver to give the Chicoms ICBM technology while taking laundered Chinese campaign money via James Riady and the Chinese restauranteur Charlie Trie. I would ask if it was treason when Sandy Berger, Clinton's former national security advisor, stole classified documents from a sCIF and stuffed them down his pants, later to hide them in a construction site.
I would ask the good Senators what they thought was the difference between treason and whistleblowing.
And I would stress Snowden was innocent until proven guilty.
Of course this was just a "gotcha" and these two hacks had no interest in a real answer. And of course it has little to do with the issue at hand, whether Gabbard was qualified to be Director of Intelligence. Too bad she didn't think of all this. But who can blame her when faced with this kind of vicious attack by former colleagues?
BTW Meet the Press pressed Eric Schmidt over the same question and he artfully dodged it. We need to take this head on.
During Tulsi Gabbard's confirmation hearing she was badgered by several Democrats about whether she considered Edward Snowden a traitor. Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla., and Sen. Michael Bennet both badgered her for an answer to that question, a point that is entirely moot, yet it was the best they could do. Gabbard's response was to try to move away from the issue. Gabbard admitted he broke the law but wouldn't use the term traitor, which was purposely chosen by the Democrats to drive a wedge between her and the MAGA wing of the Republican Party, many of whom consider him either a hero or at least a whistleblower.
Were I she I would have demanded a definition of traitor by the good Senators, and asked who decided if someone was met that definition or not. I would have pointed out that Mr. Snowden isn't a traitor until found guilty of treason by a court of law, and I supported the rule of law unlike these gentlemen who apparently place themselves above
I would point out that by their own standards certainly Hunter Biden was a traitor, and probably his old man and ask if they would call him such publicly right now.
Of course it's easy to say such things from the comfort of my armchair; not so easy in front of the whole world with people who hold your fate in their hands screaming at you.
I would mention John Kerry violating the Logan Act. I would mention the Biden Administration giving intel to Hamas. I would mention Ted Kennedy talking to Moscow. I would mention Gen. Milley telling the Chicoms he would alert them if Trump made a move against them. I would mention Bill Clinton giving Loral Aerospace a waiver to give the Chicoms ICBM technology while taking laundered Chinese campaign money via James Riady and the Chinese restauranteur Charlie Trie. I would ask if it was treason when Sandy Berger, Clinton's former national security advisor, stole classified documents from a sCIF and stuffed them down his pants, later to hide them in a construction site.
I would ask the good Senators what they thought was the difference between treason and whistleblowing.
And I would stress Snowden was innocent until proven guilty.
Of course this was just a "gotcha" and these two hacks had no interest in a real answer. And of course it has little to do with the issue at hand, whether Gabbard was qualified to be Director of Intelligence. Too bad she didn't think of all this. But who can blame her when faced with this kind of vicious attack by former colleagues?
BTW Meet the Press pressed Eric Schmidt over the same question and he artfully dodged it. We need to take this head on.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:57 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 469 words, total size 3 kb.
Meet the Dim Press
Timothy Birdnow
I caught Meet the Press this morning and host Kristen Welker asked the same question of both Republican guests on her show - Kristi Noem and Mo. Senator Eric Schmidt. That question was an attack on Trump's claim that DEI may have had something to do with the Blackhawk disaster in D.C. She demanded to know HOW that was possible, and stated the FAA claims to hire only the best and brightest and to do regular testing to ensure quality.
Noem didn't answer very well; she seemed stilted and a bit confused. Schmidt did much better, pointing out that this is about staffing or lack thereof.
Were I on the hot seat I would have answered this quite easily "exactly". The FAA is trying to have it's cake and eat it too. They want to hire good people but they want to hire a particular kind of good person and they can't find them. So these positions go unfilled and controllers (or pilots) wind up doing double duty.
And that is assuming they ARE the best people. The testing and training is "race normed" I am sure (sex normed and every other normed too) meaning they give breaks to those who they want.
For example, I learned recently that in colleges across the country you can claim some sort of disability and get UNLIMITED time to take tests. That requires a simple note to authorize it. The result is those who know this and employ it get a huge leg up on those who play by the rules and take timed tests. I strongly suspect they are doing this in government hiring as well, including by the FAA and their "standards".
The Americans with Disabilities Act provides for extra testing time in most circumstances. I was unable to open the FAA document on the matter, but I suspect they adhere to it.
Extra time is fine if you are going for a job as janitor or Congressman but air traffic control, or pilot, requires split-second action.
Anyway Schidt pointed out that time spent on DEI training was time not spent on actual job training - or on actually doing the job. And he pointed out, rightly, that DEI had driven a lot of career people out, as did the Covid protocols put in place by Biden.
A purely skills-based hiring standard had been scrapped by the Obama Administration in favor of a questionnaire over background, and sadly Trump didn't have time to reverse this (he had other fish to fry while himself being in the frying pan over his four years with baseless accusations made against him and two impeachments). Still, Trump chucked the DEI program in 2018, but Biden immediately revived it.
Democrats and the media are furious at Trump for pointing this out. They know they are vulnerable over it and do not want anyone talking about it.
I watched Hancock and Kelly, a local "Left wing/right wing" show on a local station and Hancock, the supposed conservative and former Speaker of the Missouri house, showed why the GOP keeps losing. He invoked Reagan and spoke of Reagan's rhetoric after the Challenger disaster and sneered at Trump for being "divisive" over this. Reagan is dead Republicans; get over him! He was also one of a kind. But if anyone thinks Reagan would not have blamed DEI had it been in force then they are kidding themselves. You cannot fix a problem if you won't admit what it is.
You can always tell how effective you are being by how angry you make these people. If Trump weren't angering them now we would know we were losing.
At any rate Noem didn't do so well with this or with the other questions. She was wooden and gave formulaic answers. Schmidt looked pretty good but even he missed the mark quite a bit. Our leaders simply need to read The Aviary and learn how it's done! Especially Schmidt,who is from St. Louis. Hell; I'll go have a beer with him if he wants. Many of the solutions to the world's problems are first elucidated on barstools...
I rarely watch paleomedia and this morning reminded me why I do not.
Oh, Welker also recycled the old canard of "no evidence" over this issue, you know, the one they repeated like parrots when Trump complained of vote fraud after 2020. What evidence would be satisfactory to this woman? In cases like this crash there is little in the way of actual physical evidence to prove the point anyway. What is Trump supposed to do? Get a signed affidavit from the Blackhawk pilot?
I caught Meet the Press this morning and host Kristen Welker asked the same question of both Republican guests on her show - Kristi Noem and Mo. Senator Eric Schmidt. That question was an attack on Trump's claim that DEI may have had something to do with the Blackhawk disaster in D.C. She demanded to know HOW that was possible, and stated the FAA claims to hire only the best and brightest and to do regular testing to ensure quality.
Noem didn't answer very well; she seemed stilted and a bit confused. Schmidt did much better, pointing out that this is about staffing or lack thereof.
Were I on the hot seat I would have answered this quite easily "exactly". The FAA is trying to have it's cake and eat it too. They want to hire good people but they want to hire a particular kind of good person and they can't find them. So these positions go unfilled and controllers (or pilots) wind up doing double duty.
And that is assuming they ARE the best people. The testing and training is "race normed" I am sure (sex normed and every other normed too) meaning they give breaks to those who they want.
For example, I learned recently that in colleges across the country you can claim some sort of disability and get UNLIMITED time to take tests. That requires a simple note to authorize it. The result is those who know this and employ it get a huge leg up on those who play by the rules and take timed tests. I strongly suspect they are doing this in government hiring as well, including by the FAA and their "standards".
The Americans with Disabilities Act provides for extra testing time in most circumstances. I was unable to open the FAA document on the matter, but I suspect they adhere to it.
Extra time is fine if you are going for a job as janitor or Congressman but air traffic control, or pilot, requires split-second action.
Anyway Schidt pointed out that time spent on DEI training was time not spent on actual job training - or on actually doing the job. And he pointed out, rightly, that DEI had driven a lot of career people out, as did the Covid protocols put in place by Biden.
A purely skills-based hiring standard had been scrapped by the Obama Administration in favor of a questionnaire over background, and sadly Trump didn't have time to reverse this (he had other fish to fry while himself being in the frying pan over his four years with baseless accusations made against him and two impeachments). Still, Trump chucked the DEI program in 2018, but Biden immediately revived it.
Democrats and the media are furious at Trump for pointing this out. They know they are vulnerable over it and do not want anyone talking about it.
I watched Hancock and Kelly, a local "Left wing/right wing" show on a local station and Hancock, the supposed conservative and former Speaker of the Missouri house, showed why the GOP keeps losing. He invoked Reagan and spoke of Reagan's rhetoric after the Challenger disaster and sneered at Trump for being "divisive" over this. Reagan is dead Republicans; get over him! He was also one of a kind. But if anyone thinks Reagan would not have blamed DEI had it been in force then they are kidding themselves. You cannot fix a problem if you won't admit what it is.
You can always tell how effective you are being by how angry you make these people. If Trump weren't angering them now we would know we were losing.
At any rate Noem didn't do so well with this or with the other questions. She was wooden and gave formulaic answers. Schmidt looked pretty good but even he missed the mark quite a bit. Our leaders simply need to read The Aviary and learn how it's done! Especially Schmidt,who is from St. Louis. Hell; I'll go have a beer with him if he wants. Many of the solutions to the world's problems are first elucidated on barstools...
I rarely watch paleomedia and this morning reminded me why I do not.
Oh, Welker also recycled the old canard of "no evidence" over this issue, you know, the one they repeated like parrots when Trump complained of vote fraud after 2020. What evidence would be satisfactory to this woman? In cases like this crash there is little in the way of actual physical evidence to prove the point anyway. What is Trump supposed to do? Get a signed affidavit from the Blackhawk pilot?
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:30 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 776 words, total size 5 kb.
90kb generated in CPU 0.0245, elapsed 0.432 seconds.
44 queries taking 0.4197 seconds, 233 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
44 queries taking 0.4197 seconds, 233 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
